| Application Number | M/26/00730/TPOA |
| Status | Split Decision |
| Application Valid |
|---|
| 18/05/2026 |
| Consultation End |
|---|
| N/A |
| Committee Meeting |
|---|
| N/A |
| Decision |
|---|
| Split |
| Decision Date |
|---|
| 26/05/2026 |
| Appeal Started |
|---|
| N/A |
| Appeal Decision |
|---|
| N/A |
| Summary | |
| Application Number | M/26/00730/TPOA |
| Location Address | 10 Teme Court Sunningdale Estate Knightwick Worcester WR6 5PP |
| Proposal | Works to two willows (W1 and W2), and removal of two fir trees (T1 and T2), as detailed on application form and in any accompanying information. |
| Status | Split |
| Application Type | Tree Preservation Order Application (works to) |
| Appeal Decision | N/A |
| Important Dates | |
| Application Received Date | 14/05/2026 |
| Application Valid Date | 18/05/2026 |
| Consultation Start Date | |
| Site Visited / Site Notice Date | |
| Consultation End | |
| Advert Expiry | |
| Committee Date (if applicable) | |
| Committee Agenda | |
| Decision Date | 26/05/2026 |
| Further Information | |
| Expected Decision Level | Delegated |
| Case Officer | Chris Lewis-Farley |
| Parish | Doddenham CP, Martley CP |
| Ward | Martley Ward |
| Applicant | Mr Clifford Williams |
| Agent | Mr Clifford Williams |
| Agent Address | 10 Teme Court Sunningdale Estate Knightwick WR6 5PP |
| Condition Details / Information Notes |
| The tree works hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with BS 3998:2010 (Tree Work). Reason: To attempt to avoid damage to the tree or neighbouring trees, property and services and encourage best practice in planning works and safe operations. |
| The works must be carried out by a suitably qualified tree professional. Reason: to ensure, as far as is possible, that damage to the tree or neighbouring trees, property and associated services is avoided and to ensure, as far as is possible, the adherence to best practice in the planning and execution of the tree works and the use of safe operational procedures. |
| The work must be carried out within two years from the date of this permission. Reason: As trees continue to grow, altering in shape and size, some works granted consent may become inappropriate and will require up to date assessment. |
| Information and advice on appointing an appropriately qualified and experienced tree surgeon can be found on the Natural Environment pages of the Malvern Hills District Council website at the following address or alternatively contact the Landscape Officer 01684 862407. https://www.malvernhills.gov.uk/planning/heritage/the-natural-environment/choosing-a-tree-surgeon |
| All wild bird species are legally protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) from any form of disturbance between the onset of nest building and until such time as any dependent young have left the nest, principally from the beginning of March to the end of August. |
| The spruce T2 is a good quality, well balanced tree with no signs of ill health or structural compromise. No arboricultural assessment has been submitted in support of the application to demonstrate otherwise. It has not been demonstrated that the root system of the tree has affected either the base of the tank storage or the pipe joining tank to the house. The separation between tree and tank (approximately 3 metres) makes the risk of any such damage occurring highly unlikely. The fact that the tree is within falling distance of an oil storage tank is not alone considered justification for the removal of the tree. |
| The goat willow (W2) is a good quality, well balanced tree with no signs of ill health or structural compromise. No arboricultural assessment has been submitted in support of the application to demonstrate otherwise. It is not clear how heavily reducing the tree, as suggested in the application documents, would be to the benefit of the tree or why it would "encourage healthy re-growth". Indeed, unnecessary tree works should be avoided to minimise the chances of detrimental impacts on the tree's vascular system, potentially leading to the ingress of harmful pathogens and decay, or the activation of latent pathogens or decay fungi. Any regrowth that did arise from the pollarded tree, is likely to have weaker points of attachment that a naturally developed branch structure, meaning that the tree is likely to be at higher risk of future failure compared to the uncut tree. Inadequate justification has been provided for the restriction of the tree's size. The site has adequate space to allow the development of the tree to its full potential. The proposed works would be to the detriment of the natural shape, form, and flow of the tree's canopy, and therefore to public amenity and the removal of significant sized limbs, as proposed, would mean a reduction in the available carbon that could be allocated for defence and increased competition for carbon for regrowth and reproduction. The proposed works would be considered to the detriment of the overall health and resilience of the tree and are therefore not considered acceptable. |
Plans, drawings and material submitted to the council are protected by the copyright acts (section 47, 1988 act). You may only use material which is downloaded and/or printed for consultation purposes, to compare current applications with previous schemes and to check whether developments have been completed in accordance with approved plans. Further copies must not be made without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
Tick here to show you have read and agree with the Copyright Notice.
Document Download Tips
How to reorder or group rows
Click on a column heading for the ability to sort the ‘group’ listing in ascending or descending order by using the up/down arrows. This is useful to sort by ‘name/organisation’.
| Document Type | Date | Description | File Size | Drawing/Rev Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Documents | |||||
| 01. Application Form | 14/05/2026 | Application form | (252kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 18/05/2026 | Clarification of tree works | (90kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree T2 2 | (7104kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree T1 | (5175kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree T2 | (5040kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree T2 1 | (5283kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree W1 | (5013kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree T1 And Tree W2 Branch | (5046kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree W2 2 | (4895kb) | - | |
| 03. Photo | 14/05/2026 | Tree W1 1 | (4796kb) | - | |
| Application Plans | |||||
| 04. Site / Location Plan | 14/05/2026 | Site Plan | (3456kb) | Tree location plan - | |
| Decision | |||||
| 12. Decision Notice | 26/05/2026 | Decision Notice | (162kb) | - | |
In addition to consultations with the consultee listed, we will publicise the application in accordance with national requirements and our local policy. This publicity usually takes the form of letters to nearby properties, the posting of site notices and/or the placing of a public notice in our local newspapers.
| No associated neighbours |
| No associated consultees |
| Constraints List |
| TPO REF: TPO/M/022 (1976). ADDRESS: Land At (Os 7347 5672) Sunningdale Estate Knightwick |
| Pre-SWDPR - SWDP 5: Protect and Enhance |
| Pre-SWDPR - SWDP 15: Designated Rural Areas |
| SWDPR 19: Designated Rural Areas-Meeting Affordable Housing Needs |
| SWDPR South Worcestershire Boundary: Malvern Hills District Council |
| SWDPR 29: Malvern Hills SSSI Mitigation Strategy Zone of Influence |
| Neighbourhood Plan: NPA Boundaries - Martley, Knightwick and Doddenham. Adopted: 23/02/2018 |
| Pre-SWDPR - SWDP 22: Site of Special Scientific Interest |
| No associated appeals |