| Application Number | M/25/00021/TPOA |
| Status | Application Refused |
| Application Valid |
|---|
| 06/01/2025 |
| Consultation End |
|---|
| N/A |
| Committee Meeting |
|---|
| N/A |
| Decision |
|---|
| Refusal |
| Decision Date |
|---|
| 11/02/2025 |
| Appeal Started |
|---|
| N/A |
| Appeal Decision |
|---|
| N/A |
| Summary | |
| Application Number | M/25/00021/TPOA |
| Location Address | 17 Oaklands Malvern WR14 4JE |
| Proposal | Undertake tree works, as detailed on application form and in any accompanying information. |
| Status | Refusal |
| Application Type | Tree Preservation Order Application (works to) |
| Appeal Decision | N/A |
| Important Dates | |
| Application Received Date | 06/01/2025 |
| Application Valid Date | 06/01/2025 |
| Consultation Start Date | |
| Site Visited / Site Notice Date | |
| Consultation End | |
| Advert Expiry | |
| Committee Date (if applicable) | |
| Committee Agenda | |
| Decision Date | 11/02/2025 |
| Further Information | |
| Expected Decision Level | Delegated |
| Case Officer | Chris Lewis-Farley |
| Parish | Malvern Wells CP |
| Ward | Castlemorton, Welland & Wells Ward |
| Applicant | Mrs Kim Fisher, 360 Globalnet Ltd |
| Agent | Mrs Kim Fisher, 360 Globalnet Ltd |
| Agent Address | Regus House, Herald Way Pegasus Business Park Castle Donington DE74 2TZ |
| Condition Details / Information Notes |
| Although root samples were taken from the trial/borehole in the vicinity of the house down to a depth of 3500mm, the roots found were identified as being from an oak tree i.e., no beech (or any other species) roots were found. Therefore, no conclusive link has been established between the large TPOd beech tree and any problems with the nearby house. |
| Previously, it was concluded that an oak tree to the south of the house (since removed under application reference M/24/00218/CAN) had caused the subsidence of 17 Oaklands. The oak tree stood approximately 17 metres directly to the south of 17 Oaklands. Growing in between 17 Oaklands and the spot from where the oak was removed are several mature trees. This includes 2 beech trees, one sycamore and one ash tree. All of these trees are approximately 14 metres tall, and yet to reach maturity i.e., in a period of active growth, whereas the TPOd beech tree has reached probably full size, and its growth rate expected to have slowed. The other trees are of lesser quality than the beech tree (the subject of this application). The canopy of the ash tree is almost touching the roof of 17 Oaklands, demonstrating its close proximity. There is no explanation in the submitted reports why the potential influence of these trees has been discounted. It has not been demonstrated that that these trees are not the cause of the structural problems, rather than the beech tree that is the subject of the Tree Preservation Order and this current application. |
| There are a cluster of trees (2 beech trees, one sycamore and one ash tree) growing between 17 Oaklands, and the site of the previously removed oak. It has been demonstrated that oak roots were capable of making their way through this particular piece of ground, presumably unimpeded, to beneath 17 Oaklands. It also seems likely that the roots from aforementioned cluster of trees would also be able to make their way to the same location via the same route. However, the beech tree that is the subject of this application is growing at a lower level than the house (approximately 3 metres lower) down a bank. No evidence has been provided demonstrating that the TPOd beech tree's roots have made, or indeed could make access to the ground below 17 Oaklands. |
| Other than the vegetation (trees) already mentioned, there is a spread of other vegetation present either on or in close proximity to the subject property. This includes a plum tree between the house and the TPOd beech, dense shrubbery between the TPOd beech and the house including cherry laurel, Mahonia, Buddleia, Sarcococca, Lonicera japonica, Symphoricarpos, elder and Portuguese laurel, a hedge on the southern boundary of the property comprised of yew, cherry laurel, Leyland cypress, holly and Lawson cypress, and a substantial cypress (approximately 14 metres tall) growing in a location that is a similar distance from the house as the recently removed oak. It has not been demonstrated that it is not these trees/shrubs that are causing the structural problems rather than the beech tree. |
| In the submitted arboricultural report it states "Irrespective of the identification of recovered root samples, the roots of the Copper Beech (T4) are also likely to be present below foundation level in proximity to the area of movement/damage and influencing soil moisture and volumes. Based on the technical reports currently available, engineering opinion and our own site assessment we conclude the damage is consistent with shrinkage of the clay subsoil related to moisture abstraction by vegetation. Having considered the information currently available, it is our opinion that the Oak (T5) and the Copper Beech (T4) are the principal cause of or are materially contributing to the current subsidence damage". The report provides no evidence to substantiate the suggestion that the beech tree is a contributory factor to any movement in the nearby building. The suggestion is speculative in nature only. |
Plans, drawings and material submitted to the council are protected by the copyright acts (section 47, 1988 act). You may only use material which is downloaded and/or printed for consultation purposes, to compare current applications with previous schemes and to check whether developments have been completed in accordance with approved plans. Further copies must not be made without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
Tick here to show you have read and agree with the Copyright Notice.
Document Download Tips
How to reorder or group rows
Click on a column heading for the ability to sort the ‘group’ listing in ascending or descending order by using the up/down arrows. This is useful to sort by ‘name/organisation’.
| Document Type | Date | Description | File Size | Drawing/Rev Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Documents | |||||
| 01. Application Form | 06/01/2025 | Application Form - redacted | (255kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 09/01/2025 | Level/Crack Report (6) | (1361kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 06/01/2025 | CCTV Report - May 23 | (2033kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 06/01/2025 | Engineers Report | (337kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 06/01/2025 | Arboricultural Appraisal Report | (1941kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 07/02/2025 | Level/Crack Report | (1418kb) | - | |
| 02. Supporting Information | 07/02/2025 | CCTV Report - Nov 24 | (1631kb) | - | |
| Decision | |||||
| 12. Decision Notice | 11/02/2025 | Decision Notice | (153kb) | - | |
| Planning Application Documents | |||||
| SITE PLAN - LIV-SN-23-006399.pdf | 06/01/2025 | Site Plan | (36kb) | - | |
In addition to consultations with the consultee listed, we will publicise the application in accordance with national requirements and our local policy. This publicity usually takes the form of letters to nearby properties, the posting of site notices and/or the placing of a public notice in our local newspapers.
| No associated neighbours |
| No associated consultees |
| Constraints List |
| Conservation Area 0 buffer: Malvern Wells Conservation Area |
| TPO REF: TPO/M/724 (2024). ADDRESS: 17 Oaklands Malvern WR14 4JE |
| SWDP 23: Malvern Hills National Landscape (Formerly Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) |
| SWDP 6: Conservation Area |
| SWDP 2: Development Boundary |
| SWDP 5: Urban - Unsurveyed |
| Conservation Area 25m buffer: Malvern Wells Conservation Area |
| No associated appeals |